Showing posts with label Wankhede Stadium. Show all posts

IPL 2012: credit to bowlers – slow chase of Mumbai Indians


If change in team composition can fancy your performance, then every team should follow that. But how can change in captainship refresh entire line-up, ask to Lehmann about it!

Decision to swap Sangakkara with White almost did the trick, except failed batting display. Anticipation of Chargers in fielding and bowling department is admirable. At one stage, it could be anyone’s game. However, low scoring games (tend to be) scripted with win of team batting second, and it ends in the similar way.

IPL 2012: credit to bowlers – slow chase of Mumbai Indians | Planet "M"
Despite his Man of the Match performance, it was a disappointing day for Dale Steyn and as a DC fan.
Contest between Deccan Chargers and Mumbai Indians would never be that fascinating as it was today. Restricting Chargers on a sum of 100 runs, fielding unit should receive applauds. But when time came to finish off proceedings in a complete dominance, Mumbai suddenly scrambled. It was more of a bowling show instead of blistering batting persona. The reward of winning toss favored Harbhajan Singh and Mumbai got back the winning track at home.

Wankhede Stadium of Mumbai is ready to rock the show. For the sake of given formalities, captain’s of each side appeared for toss. Mumbai declared boss of toss and asked Chargers for a bat. Mumbai underwent with two changes Levi for Blizzard, Franklin for Pollard and Munaf for Rahul Shukla; whereas, a string of changes took place for Chargers but in overseas combination only.

Mumbai’s game plan was clear before the game – get a win and improve the standings. On the other hand, Chargers can’t do much with a win either.

Match begins, field is placed and then Bhajji came with the new ball. Chargers were not given room for runs. A boundary or a six in every over and surely, Bhajji was smiling. Frustration of slow scoring enhanced batsmen to look for hits and poor try of Parthiv caught by Munaf. Patel sent off Patel, bit frenzy.

Mumbai got the momentum or you can say Chargers missed steady start. Every 1.2 over brought celebration for Mumbai fans. Franklin and Malinga brought charms to Mumbai bowling. In 13th over, Franklin bagged two wickets and ruined Chargers’ middle-order. Where 19th over of Malinga has summed up Deccan’s tail.

Just when Chargers were supposed to click over 100+ score, Malinga swapped off their charge on two consecutive balls. Wicket, Wicket and Chargers ends at 100 All OUT.

Though, chasing a mere total of 100 runs at home conditions won’t be an issue for Mumbai Indians. But pace of Steyn is something that could answer at every scenario. Levi totally beat by pace and it’s a wicket. Now, Chargers got momentum to set game or a wake-up call for Mumbai to play safe.

Mumbai kept patience and moved slowly. Their start is slower than Chargers had. Eagerness to finish low scoring game is an obvious thing for every cricketer. And somewhere, Mumbai is facing the same thing. Adding colors to that, Chargers were brilliant in bowling – courtesy well supported fielding.

At a stage, when Mumbai was 20 run short to clinch a tight-chasing-win their 5th wicket fall in form of Franklin. There were still 3.5 overs match left. A wicket or two, and the match is swapped. But nothing happened like so. Giving credit to slog overs, Mumbai batsmen hit fearless shots and sealed the game.

A chase that seems easy to walk down; ended with dominating efforts of both sides.

Mumbai, without a thought, deserve this win for given contribution; but you can’t skip Chargers’ spirit as well. Somewhere, they could end on a winning note; but then to whom you will blame.

Summarised scores:

Mumbai Indians 101/5 ( Rohit Sharma 42, Dale Steyn 2/10 ) beat Deccan Chargers 100 all out ( Shikar Dhawan 29, Malinga 4/16 ) by 5 wickets.

Man Of The Match: Dale Steyn (Deccan Charges)

IPL - 5: Let it be 'Indian Premier League' and not 'Indian Commercial League'


None of the sports ever went under so many changes like cricket has undergone.

It started its through Test cricket and in course of time it became popular through its fascinating twist and turns. But boredom struck in Test cricket as there had been endless draws due to which it suffered in dwindling spectatorship.

In the 70's arrived One-day cricket and ultimately it added a new dimension to Test cricket, spectators got hooked to Test cricket again.

IPL - 5: Let it be 'Indian Premier League' and not 'Indian Commercial League' | Planet "M"
IPL auction - the ceremonial annual event of Indian cricket, marks the beginning of a new T20 season
Test cricket got pace, got a rhythm and spread a new charm amongst the cricket lovers, courtesy One-day cricket.

Whenever I hear the word 'Cricket' it reminds me about the longer-version format of the game i.e. Test cricket - a combination of class with perfection, skills with shades of caliber and patience with volume of potential and One-day cricket where thrill and chill meets the above mentioned tributaries to produce the perfect package which indeed defines a cricketer's character.

Enters T20 cricket in the scene to invite a change and yes it has changed cricket but sadly many astonishing tributaries are in a threat to ebb away from a player.

Before T20 cricket arrived in the scene, I loved the commitment levels amongst the players. But as soon as T20 cricket arrived I just can't find it. I can see country's representation has become less important while playing for a club has become the most important.

Like cricket is said to be an explanation of one's life, describing different phases of human emotions in just a game; change in life-style brought change in game. A version of T20 cricket took place - a promise of 3 hours fun from same players with more energy and enthusiasm running in the background within same standard of gentleman's game.

Within a shorter period of time more sixes were guaranteed with extreme entertainment ensured more followers of this format. It wasn't enough though, when the concept of 'IPL' worm took place to capitalize fame of T20 cricket.

IPL - abbreviated as Indian Premier League, debuted in 2008 with a bang. That amount of success, acknowledgement and response were new to cricket. Even, it spooked EPL of football - world's most followed league. High money investment, inclusion of world's most reckoned players at one platform, 45-days of back to back 3-hours fun, raining of sixes with added fun of 'Cheer Girls' brought glamour to cricket.

It was the beginning. Cricket circus has begun. Success of season-1 turned in African Safari in 2009 with a word of every year's entertainment.

But soon, the added flavor started to cost cricket badly. 45 days of non-stop cricket, being staged at different grounds demanded high fitness standards to perform. Injuries and niggles were omitted by players in order to cash their talent in bank accounts. Playing for club became priority over nation. Retirement from longer version for sake of 'less injuries' as excuses became headlines.

Just to discount cricketers' abilities, I wonder how BCCI announced an extended version of IPL as CLT20 - a kind of World Cup at club level cricket across the globe. Are you not gaining enough from your gems at International level?


Where the spirit has gone?

IPL began with a promise to improve domestic structure of cricket in India. Inclusion of foreign players is restricted to four players per team in order to motive uncapped players that later derived club owners to assured win. A belief to improve domestic standard and figure-out future talent is overwhelmed by adopted injuries of Indian team members.

Though, IPL brought many talents in light precise to their recognizable time, yet the damage can't be skipped. If it became life-line of retired cricketers like Shane Warne, Adam GilChrist, Shaun Pollock, Stephen Fleming, Saurav Ganguly etc. it also has short cut many careers like Andrew Flintoff, Brett Lee and Lasith Malinga.

Undoubtedly, it gave many stars to Indian team with like of Yusuf Pathan, Ravindra Jadeja, Ashwin, Umesh Yadav etc. yet it didn't promise potential of any one. All these stars that sparkled through IPL were forgotten after some International appearances.

Apparently, it was the same Indian team that lifted World Cup last year but weren't able to relish the same a year later due to their consistent poor performance in away series. They lost eight Test matches in a row abroad due to lack of poor batting temperament which is badly affected by IPL's black claws.

But it was not to be as IPL was supposed to improve our cricket and cricketers.

Reply honestly, how many of you had celebrated World Cup anniversary two days back?

If India can win the World Cup before IPL, then why they were defeated enormously in every next Test series abroad? I'm not against IPL trend; even I too wait for it every year. But for sake of entertainment don't give fake words of improvement. If the intention is to just capitalize money then don't bet on talents at least.

I want IPL to be 'Indian Premier League' and not 'Indian Commercial League'. Let the BCCI's highly emphasized improvement be only in improving India's cricket rather than swelling up the bank accounts by sacrificing a cricketer's fitness, energy and commitment levels.

I dislike those entertainments which hamper a nation's happiness through poor batsmanship, poor quality bowling and poor temperament in the actual format of cricket - Test cricket. I want India to win rather than the Rajasthan Royals.

The IPL-5 has kicked off. There will 45 days of entertainment but will it guarantee team India's improvement while performing abroad in a Test match?

Author's Pick for You

You will sob bitterly and wish for further more when that day will arrive

“There have been numerous stories claiming ‘he still has a lot to deliver, stop drawing his frame’, ‘you would never know the next until...