Showing posts with label Bangladesh Cricket. Show all posts

Infographic: ICC World T20 2014 - An analysis of spin vs pace bowling


Infographic: ICC World T20 2014 - An analysis of spin vs pace bowling | Planet "M"
Rangana Herath bowled the spell of the tournament against New Zealand 
The fifth edition of the ICC World T20 ended on Sunday, April 6, 2014 with Sri Lanka emerging as the new World Twenty20 champions. While the tournament was favoured for spin bowling, stats suggests pacers took total of 57% wickets comparatively.

Though the pitch of Dhaka suited spinners as compared to the one at Chittagong, seamers managed to scalp 67 batsmen there against the 73 wickets taken by spin bowling.

Rangana Herath of Sri Lanka bowled the tournament’s best spell in an innings: his 5 for 3 in 3.3 overs against New Zealand opened the semi-final doors for the Lankan team. Whereas Mashrafe Mortaza of Bangladesh conceded 63 runs against Pakistan in a group match – most by any bowler in an innings.

In hindsight, although spinners affected a major part of the tournament, seamers dominated equally well. Not only did they manage to grab more wickets (153 overall) but were also more efficient in the 1st innings (82 wickets).

For more detailed analysis on spin vs pace bowling at the World T20, look into the infographic below:

ICC World Twenty20: Know your teams


In a short span of time, cricket’s not-so-old format – T20 Cricket – has garnered eyeballs from all around the globe. Some consider it good value-for-money for a 3-hour long match whilst others deny this format straight away in the first place.

Whether you like it or not, you just can’t ignore it. The bang-whang oriented T20 carnival has arrived, once again, to entertain its masses where the venue being Bangladesh as the hosts for the year 2014.
ICC World Twenty20: Know your teams | Planet "M"
Fifth edition of the 2014 ICC World Twenty20 to begin from March 16 onwards in Bangladesh
Here look at the participating nations competing this year for the fifth edition of ICC World T20, starting from March 16 onwards:

1. Afghanistan – the emerging heroes:


The 2009 T20 WC headline honchos are these days everywhere not just to be seen but to make it count. Their nothing-to-lose attitude could do wonders.

2. Australia – the hapless troops:


New captain for each edition of the tournament, yet none have assured a title triumph. Though, Aussie has made it to three SFs where they lost in the final v England in 2009 under the reins of Michael Clarke. Perhaps, it’s the only team whose skipper announced retirement from T20 Cricket after the end of the tournament.

3. Bangladesh – the mighty warriors:


After going through a lot, of late, Bangladesh will enter in the tournament with umpteen pressure. The team management has a lot to fix and figure out.

4. England – the not-so-late winners:


Being the concept-creator of the game, England had the sour taste of been trophy-less until 2010. The then – Kevin Pietersen dominated – victory has a lot to consider but ECB has other plans for Poms ‘Future’!

5. Hong Kong – another toddler:


Like Nepal, 2014 World T20 is first mega event for the Hong Kong cricket team. They are currently ranked as the 3rd highest non-Test Asian team in ODIs.

6. India – an ‘over-rated’ champion:


Except winning the inaugural edition, team India’s consistent failure has been a serious problem. Yet, they tend to begin as favourites. Nevertheless, they play most number of T20s comparatively!

7. Ireland – a possible danger:


Amongst all minnows, Ireland is the most consistent team and till date has played in 6 major ICC World Cups. The most flashing sight of Irish team came during the 2011 World Cup where Kevin O’Brian scored fastest WC century off 50 balls.

8. Nepal – the wee baby:


With this edition of World T20, Nepal is going to make its debut in International cricket. How they would utilise this, one has to watch for it.

9. Netherlands – the long runners:


Like the UAE, the Dutch too participated in the 1996 Cricket WC and were once a significant side to beat. Playing in its 6th ICC World Cup, Netherlands, placed in Group B, has the ability to spoil the party of others if nothing.

10. New Zealand – the perfect outfits:


If T20 cricket is all about all-rounders show, Kiwis have a steep edge here. Their recent performance against West Indies and India has been immense and who knows what’s more in the store waiting.

11. Pakistan – the most consistent:


In terms of prominent results, Pakistan is the most successful team of World T20: having made to all four SFs where they emerged as champions in 2009 before losing the final to India in 2007.

12. South Africa – the unified competitors:


South Africa would be this year’s team to watch out for. Nevertheless, they have just once reached to SFs in 2009. How team will cope with Kallis’ all-round ability would be interesting to see.

13. Sri Lanka – the T20 chokers:


Probably the most experienced side of the World Cup, Lankans, this time, have the best opportunity to celebrate trophy moments: considering the fact they missed it twice narrowly as the runners up for the years 2009 and 2012 respectively.

14. UAE – the yet unknowns:


The recently concluded U19 WC hosts – UAE will be team to watch for many obvious reasons. It’s their 3rd ICC World Cup whilst the first being 1996 Cricket World cup.

15. West Indies – the resurgent underdogs:


The most watchable side of T20 cricket, the Caribbean team has a string of match winners. The defending champion tag could add a little pressure.

16. Zimbabwe – the glory seeker:


A country better known for individual heroes rather a competitive team like they were once during late 1990s: Zimbabwe is likely to qualify from Group B in the first round.

ICC U19 World Cup: A list of hat-tricks


The 10th edition of ICC Under-19 Cricket World Cup, which is under way in the UAE, has entered in its second-half stage; where England, Sri Lanka, South Africa and New Zealand have already qualified for Super League QFs from Group C and Group D.

The other two Quarter-finalists would be decided by today’s Group League matches from Group A and Group B.

As the tournament is ideally famous for pioneering young cricketers, and history books have recorded many examples of it, let’s dig out the hat-tricks of the U19 World Cup so far.

ICC U19 World Cup: A list of hat-tricks | Planet "M"
Kuldeep Yadav became the first Indian to take a hat-trick in the history of the Under-19 World Cup.

1. Kuldeep Yadav (India):


Belongs to a rare breed of cricketers – Left arm spin or Chinaman, this 19-year-old has been a hot topic of discussion everywhere for a while. In a group match against Scotland U19, he grabbed three wickets from three consecutive deliveries; thus, acclaimed the title of first indian to have a hat-trick in Under-19 WC history.

The UP born dismissed Nick Farrar, Kyle Stirling and Alex Baum to achieve this feat; his bowling card reads: 4/28 with an economy of 2.80.

2. Harry Conway (Australia):


Coming from the Brett Lee’ hometown – Sydney, Australia – Harry Conway did an absolute blunder for Nepal U19 in the 2012 World Cup. The 6.5 feet tall was well supported by fellow-bowlers to ensure a commendable win of Australia by 212 runs - restricting Nepal below 25 overs.

The then 19-year-old bagged wickets of Pradeep Airee, Naresh Budayair and Prithu Baskota by shattering their off-stump in quick successions. He finished with 3/15 from six overs.

3. Kamran Islam Rabbi (Bangladesh):


An admirer of Dale Steyn and Wasim Akram, Kamran Islam Rabbi of Bangladesh played a pivotal role, alongside his team-mate Alauddin Babu, in the Plate final of the ICC U19 World Cup 2010 against Ireland. Defending a marginal total of 307 runs, Tigers wrapped Irish innings in the 39th over, won by 195 runs.

A frontline pacer of his side, Kamran took only 4.5 overs to complete his hat-trick – wrapping the tail of Irish-innings, dismissing Shane Getkate, Eddie Richardson and Craig Young. Kamran wishes to become a forest officer, if he can’t excel as a professional cricketer.

Note: List compelled from the match data available on the net.

Sri Lanka Premier League: Do we need it?


What if cricket had the status of soccer, I wonder.. Such numerous playing nations alongside with high profile Leagues and International fixtures, would cricket be less followed than soccer? Moreover, is the game still fascinating you in the same way?

Don’t get tangled, let me explain.

Sri Lanka Premier League: Do we need it? | Planet "M"
Sri Lanka Premier League 2012
This is the 3rd quarter of the year, and once again we’ve authenticated another T20 League to bear. The T20 trend that began with the Bangladesh Premier League in late March, August complemented another Asian child to their sole mother – Indian Premier League. With the Twenty20 Cricket World Cup in line, followed by the 4th edition of Champions League T20 in October; I can hardly see any need of such a tournament.

Isn’t the Lankan board aware of Team India’s fate due to IPL? The entire world has witnessed how pathetically the Indians fell down in the last two T20 World Cups – 2009 and 2010, with Champions status back in 2007.

Prior to the prestigious T20 WC tournament, the Indian players were completely absorbed by a demanding and lucrative T20 league – the IPL, which not only shattered them into the club-pieces, but also gifted ill-affordable fatigue and paid injuries. As a result, the team didn’t even click as a unit; nevertheless there wasn’t enough time to gel up either.

What will happen if the Lankans fair poorly at the T20 WC with due name and fame in front of the home crowd? Would anyone come ahead to take account of failure at the supreme level? Or, does your countryman not care to hold such epic loss?

You know, the Lankans have been continuously playing non-stop cricket since August 2011 – the beginning of their home season. In the recent series against India, they gestured for a needed break. Tired body language, mental fatigue, and drooped shoulders failed to spark a winning spirit as a team.

It’s time to bind your players as a unit instead of stretching them into several colorful outfits to obtain profits. The World Cup is approaching, come on!

What has happened to these cricket boards, I ask vividly. You can’t use talent this way. It is not a way to nourish future cricketers. It’s a good practice to provide a high level cricket environment for adolescents but mind you, they follow where you guide. For them, it is a learning process, not improvising.

Though purposes of such tournaments are to improve and enhance cricket culture within the nation, they need to be done with class. After completion of 5 successful IPL seasons, one can hardly count residing benefits, but many side effects.

It is understandable to follow one’s idea but you’re not forced to follow the same, are you? Can’t they come up with a similar age, or even first class cricketers equation? Just like we have an age restriction formula for several tournaments – under-15, under-17 and under-19 to name a few.

Instead of adding International players of all ages, SLC had new concepts to look at. After all, it is said to be their “domestic tournament”, isn’t it? I won’t blame the BCB and SLC for the concept of BPL and SLPL. The charm and identity IPL has brought to the cricket world at the initial level can attract anyone.

There should be an advancement from traditional methodologies and concepts of learning processes. But at the same time, you need to show concern about the affected budding cricketers. Giving them a T20 environment at an early age won’t save your test cricketers, let me say.

Having many veterans or reckoned international players’ retirement as a new ‘cricket trend’, how would you encourage your boys to play for the nation? Your T20 leagues are already giving them enough advertisement, headlines and livelihood. I’m not saying we need to stop these T20 leagues for the sake of the betterment of cricket. But there should be some provisions and policies which not only provide better cricket conditions for the young guns, but also boost sportsmanship and pride to represent the nation in the international arena.

From 2008 to 2012, we’ve seen three nations came up with separate T20 leagues; wisely tagged under ‘domestic tournament’ to earn world class fame and monetary benefits. And, of course, I won’t surprise with another ‘+1’ !

By the way, would you mind answering me this: with CLT20 established as the ‘battle of the world’s best cricket club’, do we need the T20 World Cup any more? I mean, if every ICC member starts their own T20 league we can hardly have enough time to ‘fit’ the WC there!

Still, I won’t hesitate to ask – can anyone guarantee those documented beliefs and widely spread promises? Can you assure me – by keeping your gems busy, at both International and National Level cricket activities, there will be betterment of cricket instead of cricketers?

Do we badly need a T20 league?

India Vs Sri Lanka: Again! Don't You Get Bored ?


Every next series whether it is Test or ODI, Lankans are either visiting us or inviting. It is not just about conducting a bilateral series but also, in every tri-nation or even multi-nation series – you can find the same team playing against each other.

For say, T20 World Cup group match – 2009, Asia Cup Final – 2010, ODI World Cup Final – 2011.

Just say, how many India vs Sri Lanka hype you want?

India Vs Sri Lanka: Again! Don't You Get Bored ? | Planet "M"
Mahela Jayawardene of Sri Lanka with MS Dhoni of India at the media brief before India-Sri Lanka series.
I mean bilateral series are okay but what is point of scheduling tri-nation series with them either.

From 2009, India have appeared in 16 bilateral series and 5 triangular series out of which 3 have been played against Sri Lanka; whereas in all 5 triangular series, Lankans competed as third favourite team.

And what would you say, if I compile stats between these two nations after no-series-play with Pakistan.
Numbers don't lie. Head-to-head: bilateral series between India and Sri Lanka from 2009 onwards | Planet "M" (Monika Arora)
Numbers don't lie. Head-to-head: bilateral series between India and Sri Lanka from 2009 onwards

Since 2009, India have played 6 Tests, 28 ODIs and 4 T20s against Sri Lanka overall which includes 5 finale standings. Isn’t it enough though, we are again buckled up for the same rivalry to watch.

After Pakistan’s exit, do Lankans acclaimed BCCI’s exclusive rights to play with us? Season could be new but not the opposition for us – Indians. From 2008-09 season to till now, if we have rare clash against Pakistan on the field; then in the reverse manner, we scheduled series with Lanka off the field.

Believe it or not – but only season 2011-12 was the exception where, luckily, we didn’t get the same glimpse. Only one match has been played between these two sides and that is the WC finale for which you can’t even complain! My condolence!

Instead of wondering, say thanks to Australia and Pakistan for their true calibre and peak performances during CB series and Asia Cup respectively; else it would have been another boring combination – India vs Sri Lanka in finale, AGAIN.

Are you not tired of listening same commentary, saying: “when it comes to India vs SL, MSD don’t need to interact much with his boys. They know where to take field when there is a change in strike. After all, they know each-other’s very well.

Just because India can’t play against Pakistan due to political and other issues; it doesn’t mean our every 3rd competitor would be Sri Lanka. Instead of this, can’t we give a break to our cricketers who constantly complained about too much cricket?

We can either allow them to play in domestic cricket instead of bunching against the same bouquet.

Still, if a tournament or series is that much necessary to conduct we have other nations as well. Can’t Bangladesh be the 3rd competitor instead of Lankans or even Pakistan? We could try for Indo-Pak matches at a neutral venue.

I agree, it wasn’t easy but not impossible either. Just like now BCCI trying to rebuild cricket relations with PCB; can’t it be done earlier as well? Still it is a proposal from BCCI and we have mixed of opinions. And trust me if, we had tried it earlier, it would have the same results.

If not earlier then why should now and if now, then why should not earlier?

At one hand both nations’ PM met at Mohali Stadium – not just to witness a semi final WC match, but to relish the high profile India-Pak semi final thrill; where on another side, the same nation’s players are not allowed to for an entire cricket series. What’s wrong in this, after all!

They say Sports enhance brotherhood, unity and peace but when it matters most, they step back by mentioning old issues. Can’t we resolve it?

Let cricket be your reason. Let two nations play again. Let the ground to achieve more cricket heights.

I won’t say we, India, shouldn’t play against Lanka. But at least there should be a designed gap between such redundancies. Seeing top two Asian teams playing against each other in every next 3rd series is quite tedious. NO?

Again, the same Asian giants are ready to roar in order to clinch another ODI title.

Would it be a new fascinating end as BCCI proposed Indo-Pak war on a return track? Or shall we expect more?

I would say, enjoy Mahela's captaincy as you know MSD well though!

For rest, we have CRICKET. :-)

Graphics: Monika Arora

Author's Pick for You

You will sob bitterly and wish for further more when that day will arrive

“There have been numerous stories claiming ‘he still has a lot to deliver, stop drawing his frame’, ‘you would never know the next until...